Archive for September, 2009

Three Square Meals

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

When I think of audio stories I tend to think of much more conversational, more stream-of-consciousness work than I tend to with written stories. Now I know that this isn’t really the case, most audio stories are extremely carefully constructed in post-production, after all. Yet there’s something compelling to me about the more free-flowing stuff. Or, perhaps more accurately, the stuff that’s preconstructed in a more informal manner. Not with a written script, but with careful mental rehearsal and construction beforehand. That interest actually drove this particular project.

“Three Square Meals” is an audio triptych of sorts. It is a before and after of three meals: lunch, dinner, and breakfast. Since each segment is under a minute, there’s an interesting sort of time compression. Since the segments are not formally scripted they’re a bit rambly, but I actually found this to be more of a feature than a bug. There’s an interesting sort of focus in which I, as the narrator, have to construct the most important parts of a complex series of events into a few simple observations. This odd sort of compression is highly revealing about what I considered important about what was going on.

Yet while the tone is mostly conversational, there’s a strong sense that I think is clear in the recordings that I’m not involved in a conversation. My tone and construction are those of someone relating a story in isolation, outside of the context of a conversation. There’s no sense that I’m going to have to respond to any sort of feedback from the people listening to the stories. This is the case despite the fact that these may be presented in class and I may, in fact, need to respond to my listeners. I’m fascinated by the way that such audience concerns seem somewhat inherent in my user of the medium. When speaking, if there is not an immediate opportunity for response, I don’t think of it as an interactive sort of experience despite the fact that someone could record an audio response of their own and send it to me.

I’ve presented these pieces in chronological order of recording, but I suspect there could be some interesting effects to ordering them differently. Anyway, without further ado…

Three Square Meals – Lunch:

Three Square Meals – Dinner:

Three Square Meals – Breakfast:

Pichat

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

The idea for this project grew out of an offhand comment during class, one that Shawn suggested was interesting and one that, as I thought about it, struck me as interesting as well.

“Pichat” is an attempt to force people into creativity in two separate, and rather unrelated, ways. It is, at its core, a relatively standard AJAX-based chat interface, but instead of transmitting text back and forth, Pichat transmits images. The only text used is that necessary to identify users.

The interface is relatively simple. Using an AJAX call to google’s search API, a user may enter any valid google search string and get the first four image results that fall within a specific size class. These four results are displayed for the user to consider. If the user decides to utilize one of these images, all they need to do is click on it and it will be sent as their message to the chatroom. If none of the four images seems suitable then they must search for a different term.

There are two points of restriction here, and both of them are in some way compelling. The first is that communication is image-only. Trying to compress a thought or expression into a single image (even when given the entire internet to draw from) can be an extremely difficult and creative process, and I’d love to explore the sorts of conversations that arise in this environment. Additionally, you only get access to the top four search results from google. If none of them do what you want, rather than being able to page through to more, you must refine your search. Crafting a search string specific enough to get you what you want provides an interesting challenge as you can not simply search for something “close enough” and then dig through the pile of results manually until you find what you want.

On a down note, the code for this thing is abysmal. It’s a flat-file stored, full text-dumping PHP implementation on the back end that results in massive levels of back-end processing and bandwidth inefficiency and significant front-end inefficiency in addition to a number of interface issues that just make it ugly.

Still, it may be something you want to try out, and if you do you can play around with it at http://itp.thomas-robertson.com/liveweb/pichat/.

A Single Rose

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

Maya had been told that most of the year the massive rail lines designated to serve the Citadel Military Cemetery were mostly empty. A vast testament to how many had died, and how few survived to visit them. Today, however, the trains were packed. It was the one-year anniversary of the Battle of Kar’Dathra’s gate, the beginning of the end, and it seemed that, for today at least, no one was able to suppress their need to mourn.

Maya’s uniform had won her a seat. The civilians pressing out of the way of the severely cut beige greatcoat. The rank tabs at her collar had won her elbow room, as even the others who had managed a seat in the cramped space backed away from her in a mixture of respect, awe, and fear. Sorceress-officers were rare, and those with a campaign ribbon for Al’Istaan rarer still. The sorcery corps had suffered casualties horrifying enough to be noteworthy in a battle that had killed millions.

A small part of Maya resented the space. She was just another woman who had lost everything to the war, she deserved no special treatment. Most of her, however, was grateful, for the space afforded by her uniform and rank meant she could write a letter. A letter that no one else would ever read.

Beloved Marcus,

Today marks one year since Kar’Dathra’s Gate. One year of waking in the middle of the night and reaching out to find myself in our bed alone. One year of turning to share an amusing observation with you only to be brutally reminded that you are gone. One year since your squad joined the list of those “missing, presumed dead”. I wish I had the eloquence to say what must be said. There are words bottled up inside me that I can’t express. It is said that time heals all wounds, and while the past year has proved that to be a lie, perhaps the inexorable march of time will eventually permit me to pour out what wells in my soul.

They told us that Al’Istaan would change the course of our nation, that it would set us once more on the inexorable path to greatness. In this they were half-right. The course of the United Republics of the Red Star changed, turning from mere stagnation to rapid collapse. I am surprised that we are not yet at war with ourselves, though I am grateful to whatever giver of miracles keeps us from tearing ourselves apart. There are those that fear that our nation could not survive a civil war, but that is not what haunts my troubled sleep. For our nation is doomed already, even if those in power are slow to realize it. No, what I fear is that our humanity would not survive a civil war. We are ruled by fear now more than ever, and the rhetoric from the Navy and the Party are that of strength and solidarity. A civil war would mean Al’Istaan all over again, except that we would be doing it to ourselves. Our people would be fed into the inexorable machine of war, and I’m not sure anything would be left to come out the other side.

And, yet, as much as I fear that the loss of our humanity is inevitable, I would gladly see it happen if it meant I could see you again. Just once, to catch your eye, to see you smile, to breathe in your scent. I know it is petty of me, but I would see our nation burn, and our people with it, if it meant you came back from Al’Istaan with me. Our nation is lost and unsure of itself, but I almost envy them. For I am lost and terrifyingly sure of myself. The wounds your loss has left on my soul will never close. I will never wake up not expecting your warm arms around me, or turn to glance over my shoulder without expecting to find your smile.

I find myself filling my days with duty. It is empty of joy, but it holds something that is like purpose, and while it terrifies me to admit it: I am no longer sure I have one of my own anymore. The memories of you hurt more than I can say. Each joy we shared now rubs my soul raw with loss. I hope and pray that you can forgive me, for when I wake tomorrow I shall immerse myself in my empty duty, drown my memories in a sea of mundane tasks, and I shall do my utter best to forget you.

I am sorry. I love you.

For eternity,
Maya

A few tears fell onto the page as Maya lifted her pencil, causing her to blink in surprise. She had not thought that there were any left within her. Not after the past year in which she had wept until she couldn’t anymore. Apparently the well of grief never fully ran dry. She lifted the letter and blotted it gently against the shoulder of her coat before folding it with careful precision and writing “Marcus” across it.

She stared at the name, blinking slowly, and lifted the crisp paper to her lips. It hurt to know that this was as close to kissing him again as she would ever come. Her eyes slid closed and her lips brushed across the paper in a signature more personal than anything she could have written. And she stayed that way even after the chime announcing the train’s arrival sounded. She could hear the people shuffling off, but could not bring herself to join them.

Eventually, after the sound of footsteps had faded into nothing but memory, she opened her eyes to find a single rose in her lap. Maya looked around the empty space as if that would reveal the flower’s source, but she was alone. Perhaps some stranger in that crowd of people had seen something of themselves in her grief, or perhaps it had simply fallen from one of the many bouquets and wreathes being carried today, it didn’t really matter which. Maya lifted the flower, letting it twist slowly between her fingers, and nodded to herself. Then she stood up, forced her shoulders square, and walked out into the snow.

It was time to see her husband.

Driving Forces

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

I knew going in that one of the things I wanted to focus my thinking on for this course was the growing levels of social interconnection as facilitated by communications technology. So I suppose it was inevitable that the predetermined driving force I find most compelling is that connectedness will continue to rise, and rise rapidly, in terms of both demographic penetration (more people will have access) and ubiquity (people will have more and more regular access). This seems to be rather well supported by the current US administration’s push for a national broadband plan from the FCC, as well as continued infrastructure development by the major telcos (fiber-to-the-home, newer and faster cellular data technologies, bigger pipelines for cable data transfers).

This actually leads, at least in my mind, to a fascinating critical uncertainty. Will the drive toward urbanization increase in importance, or decrease in importance. One of the traditional functions of dense urban environments has been to foster high levels of interconnection. Because long-distance communication tools, especially for groups, have historically been poor, and because face-to-face contact is still the highest bandwidth method of communication in regular use, urbanization has been essentially inevitable to whatever degree our logistics systems could support it. While urban centers certainly do more than facilitate communication, it strikes me that this has always been one of the most important drivers of the movement. Thus it becomes a serious question whether or not increasingly good tools for long-distance communication will be enough to sort of ‘take over part of the market’ for communication facilitation from urban areas.

Telling stories online (an analysis)

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

So last night I posted a log of my story telling experience in an IM chatroom last night. This morning I figured I might as well do some analysis.

One of the first things that stands out to me (and justifies my obsessive time-stamping) is the fact that the set up and storytelling took twenty-five minutes, and the story itself took just over twelve. Since the story probably took about three or four minutes to related in class (maybe five or six if you include discussion time), this is a rather significant slow-down. Not that this is particularly surprising since there’s always a slow-down when moving from a high-bandwidth mode of communication, like face-to-face discussion, to a low-bandwidth mode like instant messaging.

But the slow-down isn’t entirely tool-based. Or, perhaps more accurately, it’s not tied to the technical aspects of the tools. Because while I do type slower than I talk, I can type extremely quickly. Combined with the way that we tend to distill things when they shift to text (elaborating less in order to make things more compact and coherent) I probably could have whipped the story out in a minute or two. Just looking at the content of my story-telling shows how little there actually is there. The story may be a hundred and fifty words, but it’s probably less than that, and it still took significant time to compose and transmit.

So there’s clearly more at work here than text being slower than speech, and I think it has a lot to do with the social conventions of IM, which are quite deeply drilled into my head. IM is a give-and-take medium. Turn taking is indicated by message submission, so the conversation tends to pause slightly after every line in an implicit offer to everyone else to respond. Only if there is no response for a while does the thread of the story get picked back up, which provides for a sort of stilted feeling if you were to read it aloud in real-time, but seems to be a natural expression of the IM medium.

Further, IM is generally considered to be a conversational medium rather than a performer-audience one. People are expected to interject and comment, and when they do the discussion is briefly derailed as people respond to that response. We don’t really have, or at least I and the people I spend time with online don’t really have, a set of norms for non-conversational story-telling. That means that most of our stories tend to come out looking like conversations rather than a more formal sort of presenter-audience interaction.

I don’t know if there’s much more to say than that. It’s not something that bothers me, after all. In fact, I think I rather like it. It does, however, highlight two important things:

1) Various mediums lend themselves to various uses. Picking a medium that is unsuited to your intended use may be a bad idea, or it may just result in something interestingly unexpected. After all, while it doesn’t look much at all like the in-class presentation of my story, I rather enjoyed the online telling of it too.

2) Computer-mediated interactions are about more than just the technological tools being used. While there’s nothing inherent in the technology of instant messaging that prevents a story from being told in a much more traditional form (what one might call a “wall of text”), there are cultural norms about the use of instant messaging that would make that feel weird, almost like a violation.

And so, I feel that the exercise was well worth undertaking, and that it was fun, to boot.

Telling stories online (a log)

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

The assignment was to tell our story in an online environment. Ironically I was assigned one of the two I was fully prepared to do already: an IM-based chat. Since I know many, many people who are on AIM, and many of them are frequent chatters, I sort of cheated and dropped into an existing (and regularly-occurring) chatroom. It also, conveniently, is peopled by total nerds. Who have questionable senses of humor. As you’ll see. I sanitized the chat logs of their SNs and then checked to see if they wanted anything else cut (which they didn’t), and here are the results (this is just the record of the discussion, my analysis will be undertaken in a later post (now linked)):

(more…)

Identity is what you make of it

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

It hadn’t taken all that long, really, for the pronoun confusion to set in. Four short months were apparently sufficient to produce a moment of cognitive dissonance whenever someone used “he” instead of “she”. It’s two years later and it’s not so bad now, but he still occasionally looks to see who “he” is.

Identity (a six word story)

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Multiple identities make for awkward introductions.